Facilitating the provision of detailed, deep and useful feedback is an important design feature of any educational programme. Here we evaluate feedback provided to medical students completing short transferable skills projects. Feedback quantity and depth were evaluated before and after a simple intervention to change the structure of the feedback-provision form from a blank free-text feedback form to a structured proforma that asked a pair of short questions for each of the six domains being assessed. Each pair of questions consisted of asking the marker ?占퐓hat was done well???and ?占퐓hat changes would improve the assignment???Changing the form was associated with a significant increase in the quantity of the feedback and in the amount and quality of feedback provided to students. We also observed that, for these double-marked projects, the marker designated as ?占퐉arker 1??consistently wrote more feedback than the marker designated ?占퐉arker 2??
Citations
Citations to this article as recorded by
Development and evaluation of two interventions to improve students’ reflection on feedback Richard Harris, Pam Blundell-Birtill, Madeleine Pownall Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education.2023; 48(5): 672. CrossRef
Animated process-transparency in student evaluation of teaching: effects on the quality and quantity of student feedback Marloes Nederhand, Bas Giesbers, Judith Auer, Ad Scheepers Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education.2023; : 1. CrossRef
How an EPA-based curriculum supports professional identity formation Anne E. Bremer, Marjolein H. J. van de Pol, Roland F. J. M. Laan, Cornelia R. M. G. Fluit BMC Medical Education.2022;[Epub] CrossRef
Narrative Assessments in Higher Education: A Scoping Review to Identify Evidence-Based Quality Indicators Molk Chakroun, Vincent R. Dion, Kathleen Ouellet, Ann Graillon, Valérie Désilets, Marianne Xhignesse, Christina St-Onge Academic Medicine.2022; 97(11): 1699. CrossRef
Teaching in Geriatrics: The Potential of a Structured Written Feedback for the Improvement of Lectures Theresa Pohlmann, Volker Paulmann, Sandra Steffens, Klaus Hager European Journal of Geriatrics and Gerontology.2022; 4(3): 123. CrossRef
Enhancing written feedback: The use of a cover sheet influences feedback quality J.G. Arts, M. Jaspers, D. Joosten-ten Brinke, Sammy King Fai Hui Cogent Education.2021;[Epub] CrossRef
Implementation of written structured feedback into a surgical OSCE J. Sterz, S. Linßen, M. C. Stefanescu, T. Schreckenbach, L. B. Seifert, M. Ruesseler BMC Medical Education.2021;[Epub] CrossRef
Eliciting student feedback for course development: the application of a qualitative course evaluation tool among business research students Carly Steyn, Clint Davies, Adeel Sambo Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education.2019; 44(1): 11. CrossRef
Effect of individual structured and qualified feedback on improving clinical performance of dental students in clinical courses‐randomised controlled study I. M. Schüler, R. Heinrich‐Weltzien, M. Eiselt European Journal of Dental Education.2018;[Epub] CrossRef
The Effect of High-Frequency, Structured Expert Feedback on the Learning Curves of Basic Interventional Ultrasound Skills Applied to Regional Anesthesia Getúlio Rodrigues de Oliveira Filho, Francisco de Assis Caire Mettrau Anesthesia & Analgesia.2018; 126(3): 1028. CrossRef
A case study on written comments as a form of feedback in teacher education: so much to gain Jorik Gerardus Arts, Mieke Jaspers, Desiree Joosten-ten Brinke European Journal of Teacher Education.2016; 39(2): 159. CrossRef
Medical students’ satisfaction with the Applied Basic Clinical Seminar with Scenarios for Students, a novel simulation-based learning method in Greece Panteleimon Pantelidis, Nikolaos Staikoglou, Georgios Paparoidamis, Christos Drosos, Stefanos Karamaroudis, Athina Samara, Christodoulos Keskinis, Michail Sideris, George Giannakoulas, Georgios Tsoulfas, Asterios Karagiannis Journal of Educational Evaluation for Health Professions.2016; 13: 13. CrossRef
The effect of written standardized feedback on the structure and quality of surgical lectures: A prospective cohort study Jasmina Sterz, Sebastian H. Höfer, Bernd Bender, Maren Janko, Farzin Adili, Miriam Ruesseler BMC Medical Education.2016;[Epub] CrossRef
Group Peer Teaching: A Strategy for Building Confidence in Communication and Teamwork Skills in Physical Therapy Students Christopher Seenan, Sivaramkumar Shanmugam, Jennie Stewart Journal of Physical Therapy Education.2016; 30(3): 40. CrossRef
Does Reflective Learning with Feedback Improve Dental Students’ Self‐Perceived Competence in Clinical Preparedness? Jung-Joon Ihm, Deog-Gyu Seo Journal of Dental Education.2016; 80(2): 173. CrossRef
Encouraging formative assessments of leadership for foundation doctors Lindsay Hadley, David Black, Jan Welch, Peter Reynolds, Clare Penlington The Clinical Teacher.2015; 12(4): 231. CrossRef
Use of the ‘Stop, Start, Continue’ method is associated with the production of constructive qualitative feedback by students in higher education Alice Hoon, Emily Oliver, Kasia Szpakowska, Philip Newton Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education.2015; 40(5): 755. CrossRef
The New Era of : What Should Be Prepared to Be a Top Journal in the Category of Gastroenterology and Hepatology Sun Huh Journal of Neurogastroenterology and Motility.2013; 19(4): 419. CrossRef